Unverified50% confidenceFactExact time
The direct reason for the "leaking is safe" decision is that reference cycles in Rc<T> themselves prevent destructor execution from occurring; if leaking were considered unsafe, Rc would also have to be marked as unsafe.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
8/9/2026
First Seen
Sources
Rust不可移动类型与保证析构深度解析
Related Claims
UnverifiedOnce model weights are publicly released, safety restrictions can be removed through fine-tuning; research shows that as few as a small number (sometimes fewer than 100) of harmful instruction-response pairs combined with techniques such as LoRA can remove safety restrictions.57% similarUnverifiedCC0包含两层机制：法律允许最大范围内放弃所有权利的waiver，以及适用于不承认放弃版权概念管辖区的退路许可（fallback license）56% similarUnverifiedBranch protection rules can mandate that CI checks pass before merging is allowed, upgrading the code quality gate from relying on individual self-discipline to system-enforced execution.54% similarUnverifiedIn this case, the dangerous code was intercepted by the company's code review mechanism and never entered the production environment.53% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/714197API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/714197MCP
get_claim(id=714197)