Unverified50% confidenceFactExact time
Article 48 of the GDPR stipulates that judgments of courts or administrative authorities of third countries cannot serve as a legal basis for transferring data to third countries, which is in fundamental conflict with the CLOUD Act.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
8/9/2026
First Seen
Sources
Fastmail推出欧盟数据区：邮件数据主权的新选择
Related Claims
UnverifiedGDPR第7条第4款规定，当数据处理的同意与合同履行相捆绑，且该数据处理对合同履行并非必要时，此类同意不得被视为自由给出64% similarUnverifiedThe GDPR (General Data Protection Regulation of the European Union) came into effect in 2018, stipulating that personal data of EU citizens may not in principle be transferred to third countries that have not been recognized as providing an adequate level of protection.64% similarUnverifiedThe 2020 Schrems II ruling invalidated the EU-US Privacy Shield, and Articles 44–49 of the GDPR stipulate that the transfer of personal data to third countries must satisfy conditions such as adequacy decisions, Standard Contractual Clauses (SCCs), or Binding Corporate Rules (BCRs).63% similarUnverifiedGDPR第44条明确限制个人数据的跨境传输61% similarUnverified2018年美国通过的CLOUD Act赋予美国执法机构要求本国企业提供存储于境外服务器数据的权力，与欧盟GDPR形成直接冲突61% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/718730API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/718730MCP
get_claim(id=718730)