Unverified60% confidenceSolutionExact time
The report displays risk levels and judgment confidence separately, lowering the confidence annotation when evidence is insufficient, in order to combat the erosion of professional judgment by AI hallucination problems
2
Sources
60%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
8/13/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Claims
Unverified医疗AI中的选择性预测机制在低置信度时拒绝答案转介人工审核，被证明比强制输出答案更能降低临床风险79% similarUnverified针对 AI Overviews 的独立研究已指出来源质量和声明保真度方面的担忧，尤其是在底层信息不完整或不一致的情况下。78% similarUnverifiedIn the field of AI safety, 'being able to report gaps' is often called honesty or calibration; a model that only pursues 'always answering when asked' tends to fill in blanks with plausible guesses when facing missing information, and this is precisely the source of hallucinations.77% similarUnverifiedAI disclosure may trigger viewers' doubts about authenticity and sincerity through the mechanism of "algorithm aversion", thereby reducing their willingness to engage.75% similarUnverifiedA fluent and affirmatively worded AI summary reinforces false credibility and is more readily accepted than an ambiguous report, even when the former is wrong.75% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/743486API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/743486MCP
get_claim(id=743486)