Unverified60% confidenceBenchmarkExact time
In the Terminal Bench test, Qwen 3.6 27B scored approximately 60.7, while Muse Glimmer scored only 51.7, falling significantly behind.
2
Sources
60%
Confidence
Medium-term (~90 days)
Relevance
8/17/2026
First Seen
Valid until: 11/15/2026
Sources
Meta Muse Glimmer 30B深度评测：视觉理解能力惊艳，本地部署门槛低
Related Claims
UnverifiedExperience internalization fine-tuning improved Qwen3-8B-27B's one-shot score from 37.07 to 48.22, while reducing generated tokens from 6.41 million to 570,000 (an 11-fold reduction).76% similarUnverifiedOn SWE Bench Pro, Glimmer narrowly beat Qwen with 51.2 vs. 50.2, but Qwen surpassed it on SWE Bench Verified (Qwen 77.2 vs. 76) and Terminal Bench (Qwen 60.7 vs. 51.7).75% similarUnverifiedQwen 3 Max scored 65 points across eight tests with a score rate of 81.25%, ranking second on the reviewer's leaderboard, behind only the Claude flagship with a score rate of 82.5%.75% similarUnverifiedThe fine-tuned Qwen3.5-4B model improved accuracy on BU Bench V1 from 15% to 53%.75% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/762696API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/762696MCP
get_claim(id=762696)