Unverified50% confidenceFactExact time
CFC基准中V1–V4无法恢复已被排除，V6是早期不稳定基线无法精确聚合，99.3%是在可重建可评分的子集上得出的
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Medium-term (~90 days)
Relevance
8/24/2026
First Seen
Valid until: 11/22/2026
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedThe OPUS 4.6 distilled version comes from the Jacker community and performed well in the Qwen 3.5 era, but the 3.6 V1 preview test results were unsatisfactory, and its Q6 precision also falls short of NVFP4.60% similarUnverifiedCFC基准的历史序列涵盖V1至V100，最终发布的可复现测试集包含95个变体、共计285次重复运行57% similarUnverifiedIn the Q4_K_XL scheme, MoE layers use MXFP4 and the remaining layers are compressed to Q8_0, achieving 96% same on top-1% prediction consistency56% similarUnverifiedThe original Qwen3.6 27B Q4 scored 97 in the tool-calling test, demonstrating that distillation does not always improve performance.53% similarUnverifiedDeepSeek V4 Pro's floating-point operations have been reduced to 27% of the V3.2 version (a 3.7x reduction).53% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/793314API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/793314MCP
get_claim(id=793314)