Unverified50% confidenceOpinionExact time
After testing the TSB-AD-M benchmark data, the author found that simple SPC methods could beat SOTA methods in most cases.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
8/31/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedSuperpowers的TDD流程要求AI先编写失败的测试用例，再编写刚好能让测试通过的最小实现代码65% similarUnverified多种子重复实验中可使用配对t检验或Wilcoxon符号秩检验比较两组准确率分布，其中Wilcoxon检验因不依赖正态性假设更适合小样本62% similarUnverified该研究采用LOSO（留一被试交叉验证）结合Wilcoxon符号秩检验的评估方法62% similarUnverifiedA researcher claimed on Reddit that using the century-old Statistical Process Control (SPC) algorithm, they were able to beat current state-of-the-art (SOTA) methods on mainstream time-series anomaly detection benchmarks.62% similarUnverified一位前CTO设计了一个15秒的coding小测试，声称快速筛掉了50%不合格的候选人62% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/829347API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/829347MCP
get_claim(id=829347)