Unverified60% confidenceEventExact time
Thousands of visual artists jointly sued Stability AI and Midjourney, claiming their works were used illegally for model training.
2
Sources
60%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
9/11/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
VerifiedGetty Images sued Stability AI, and artists collectively sued Midjourney, with the core dispute being whether the images used to train the models were authorized by the original creators76% similarUnverifiedThe core controversies surrounding AI-generated art include whether the sources of training data are lawful, whether they infringe on human artists' rights, and whether they can be considered genuine creative works.69% similarUnverifiedMany artists believe that AI image generation tools are built on the unauthorized use of their works.68% similarUnverifiedA large number of illustrations, novels, and comics publicly available on the internet have been incorporated into AI model training datasets without authorization.66% similarUnverifiedThe training data for AI image generation models contains a large number of copyrighted illustrations, photographs, and design works, without the creators being informed or obtaining authorization or attribution.65% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/895019API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/895019MCP
get_claim(id=895019)