Unverified50% confidenceEventExact time
The head of OpenAI's mathematics team publicly refuted the allegation of authorship exclusion, calling it inaccurate.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Medium-term (~90 days)
Relevance
9/11/2026
First Seen
Valid until: 12/10/2026
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedOpenAI's statement currently comes from a single source and has not yet been verified through peer review by the independent mathematics community.67% similarUnverifiedOpenAI's Bubeck admitted to poor wording and apologized, but denied demanding that Alpoge be removed from the paper.65% similarUnverifiedOpenAI's system card acknowledges that benchmarks cannot cover model behavior across all real-world usage scenarios, particularly noting uncertainty when the model is used in combination with other tools.59% similarUnverifiedThe New York Times v. OpenAI case directly targets the unauthorized use of training data.57% similarUnverifiedAnthropic did not report data for many benchmarks in this release, whereas OpenAI provided nearly all metrics.55% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/896282API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/896282MCP
get_claim(id=896282)