Unverified50% confidenceFactExact time
The 1978 case Stump v. Sparkman further refined the criteria for determining judicial immunity, holding that as long as a judge's conduct constitutes a judicial act within the scope of jurisdiction, immunity applies even in the presence of serious error or malice.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
9/11/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedThe landmark establishment of judicial immunity in the United States can be traced back to the Supreme Court's 1872 case Bradley v. Fisher.62% similarUnverifiedThe rudimentary form of the judicial immunity principle in English law can be traced back to the 1613 case Floyd v. Barker.62% similarUnverified美国联邦最高法院在多项判决中承认寒蝉效应对第一修正案的侵蚀作用，并作为判断政府行为是否违宪的考量维度59% similarUnverified联邦第七巡回上诉法院法官理查德·波斯纳等人早在1990年代就开始质疑稀缺性原则的合宪性基础59% similarUnverified寒蝉效应（Chilling Effect）最早由美国联邦最高法院大法官威廉·道格拉斯在1952年'威曼诉厄普德格拉夫案'中系统阐述56% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/897009API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/897009MCP
get_claim(id=897009)