Unverified50% confidenceFactExact time
The AAAI-27 modification guidelines discourage substantive changes and define the applicable circumstances for rejection as modifications that cause the submission to describe fundamentally different research.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Medium-term (~90 days)
Relevance
9/11/2026
First Seen
Valid until: 12/10/2026
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
VerifiedIn early 2023, top journals such as Science and Nature explicitly prohibited listing AI as a paper author, but allowed disclosure of AI's assistive use in the methodology section.61% similarUnverifiedRegulators have determined that formal human intervention steps that lack substantive review capability are insufficient to circumvent the applicability of Article 22 of the GDPR.60% similarUnverifiedAcademia broadly believes that the protections afforded by Section 230 may not fully cover scenarios involving AI-generated content, making a new legislative framework inevitable.59% similarUnverified2012年旧金山科研评估宣言（DORA）明确反对将期刊IF用于评估个体研究者，2015年莱顿宣言提出负责任使用科研计量的十项原则57% similarUnverifiedRefill tools are essentially a means of circumventing official usage restrictions and may violate Anthropic's terms of service.57% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/898837API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/898837MCP
get_claim(id=898837)