Expired50% confidenceFactExact time
This evaluation used six composite questions covering front-end, reasoning, and causality, with V4.1 Flash, V4 Flash, V4 Pro with deep thinking enabled, and JLM 5.3 Flash tested back-to-back on the same questions.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Short-term (~14 days)
Relevance
9/11/2026
First Seen
This claim has expired. It is kept for the record and no longer describes the current state.
Valid until: 9/25/2026(expired)
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedIn the cube unfolding and 3D folding question, both V4.1 Flash and V4 Flash produced blank screens and failed, V4 Pro had a correct unfolding diagram but failed due to incorrect closure logic, and JLM 5.3 Flash performed best.75% similarUnverifiedIn the vector design tool and state machine logic question, all four models passed, with V4.1 Flash performing most stably and achieving the best industrial UI aesthetic.73% similarUnverifiedDeepSeek-Reasonix offers two base model options—V3 Flash and V3 Pro—along with five reasoning intensity levels.72% similarUnverifiedAfter repair, DeepSeek V4 Flash can compete directly with flagship models.68% similarVerifiedDeepSeek has launched the experimental multimodal model V4-Flash-Vision-EXP on its API platform, with text capabilities on par with V4 Flash and multimodal agent benchmark performance close to Opus 4.8 levels.67% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/900421API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/900421MCP
get_claim(id=900421)