Expired50% confidenceFactExact time
Among the rejected papers, 22 were rejected because their detection scores exceeded 0.5 and the authors had checked the declaration stating they had not used AI.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Short-term (~14 days)
Relevance
9/11/2026
First Seen
Valid until: 9/25/2026(expired)
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
Unverified使用AI辅助的学生在不能使用AI的闭卷考试中成绩下降了20%68% similarUnverified当模型参考某作者五篇样本并模仿其风格时，AI文本检测器的检出能力大幅下降65% similarUnverifiedApproximately 23% of papers could not be fully reproduced as claimed, and at least 496 papers had at least one claim that was falsified or disputed.63% similarUnverified在某些测试条件下，主流AI编程工具推荐不存在包名的概率可达5%~20%63% similarVerifiedIn a 2024 research paper, Anthropic quantified the phenomenon of model over-refusal, finding that safety-trained models had false positive refusal rates as high as 15–30% in certain scenarios62% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/900981API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/900981MCP
get_claim(id=900981)