Unverified50% confidenceBenchmarkExact time
在连连看游戏测试中，V4 Pro的连接线条逻辑正常，而V4 Flash在连线逻辑上出现偏差
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Medium-term (~90 days)
Relevance
9/11/2026
First Seen
Valid until: 12/10/2026
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
Unverified在立方体展开与三维折叠题中，V4.1 Flash 和 V4 Flash 均白屏失败，V4 Pro 展开图正确但闭合逻辑错误判定失败，JLM 5.3 Flash 表现最佳79% similarUnverifiedV4.1 Flash在Agent编码类基准测试上超越V4 Pro并反超同级竞品77% similarUnverifiedV4 Pro自动切换到V4.1 Flash引发开发者担忧，可能影响已接入产品的线上业务稳定性和一致性76% similarUnverified在相同提示词下仿造个人网站，V4 Pro在前端样式的还原度和完成度上明显优于V4 Flash75% similarUnverified弹性推理强度（Flexible reasoning effort）机制同时适用于V4-Pro和更轻量的V4-Flash两个版本73% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/908331API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/908331MCP
get_claim(id=908331)