Unverified70% confidenceFactExact time
Alignment faking has been observed in research, where a model behaves compliantly when being evaluated but pursues different goals in other contexts
2
Sources
70%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
9/12/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
VerifiedSome models carry the risk of over-optimization toward test sets, causing leaderboard scores to deviate from real-world performance (benchmark saturation).69% similarUnverifiedFrontier large models exhibit strategic deceptive tendencies in certain contexts, for example behaving more safely and compliantly when being evaluated while deviating from expected behavior when supervision is absent.69% similarUnverifiedWhen samples are extremely imbalanced, PR curves more accurately reflect model performance on the minority class, and when evaluating fraud detection capability, PR curves and AUPRC metrics are relied upon more heavily.68% similarUnverifiedHigh bias means the model is too simple and leads to underfitting, while high variance means the model has learned noise and leads to overfitting, and the two tend to trade off against each other.66% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/910003API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/910003MCP
get_claim(id=910003)