Unverified50% confidenceFactExact time
Research shows that both classical automated metrics and reference-free LLM-as-a-Judge methods have proven unreliable under large-scale expert judgment.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
9/12/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedAlthough reference-free LLM scoring is convenient, it may systematically deviate from expert judgment.74% similarUnverifiedWhen a reviewer rejects a paper on the grounds of data scale, two situations must be distinguished: the method itself requires large data to be effective (a legitimate flaw) versus the reviewer simply expecting large-scale experiments (a one-dimensional evaluation standard).70% similarUnverifiedAutomated deepfake detection tools are subject to false negatives and false positives and should serve as a supplementary judgment aid rather than an absolute authority.70% similarUnverified自动化指标（如BLEU、COMET、chrF）与人类判断的相关性有限，在评估语气和细微含义时尤其容易失真，应作为辅助而非主要依据70% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/911451API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/911451MCP
get_claim(id=911451)