Unverified60% confidenceFactExact time
AGPL 3.0 requires that all modified source code be made public even when providing services to users over a network (SaaS model), whereas the MIT license has almost no restrictions and allows free commercial use and closed-source distribution.
2
Sources
60%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
9/12/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedThe AGPL license requires that any network service built on its code must make the complete source code available to users even if no executable files are distributed79% similarUnverifiedPost-its App uses the AGPL 3.0 license rather than MIT, which places significant restrictions on commercial use.75% similarUnverifiedLaya uses the MIT open-source license, is completely free, and can be integrated with external call chains such as Cloud and Core.65% similarUnverifiedT3MP3ST 以 AGPL-3.0 协议完全开源、免费发布64% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/913286API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/913286MCP
get_claim(id=913286)