Unverified50% confidenceOpinionExact time
The Omni naming implies multimodal all-around capabilities, Flash continues the lightweight, low-latency, high-cost-efficiency positioning, and the version number 1.1 indicates this is a targeted capability enhancement rather than a complete overhaul
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Medium-term (~90 days)
Relevance
9/12/2026
First Seen
Valid until: 12/11/2026
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedThe Flash series, in terms of naming convention, is typically positioned toward lightweight, high-speed, and low-cost use cases.72% similarUnverifiedCompared to the old Flash model, V4.1 Flash has more comprehensive capabilities and more accurate recognition, but takes longer and costs more per session.70% similarUnverifiedThe Flash version is positioned as a lighter, faster inference option suited for latency-sensitive or resource-constrained scenarios, while the PRO version targets a higher capability ceiling with greater demands on VRAM and compute69% similarUnverifiedIn the vector design tool and state machine logic question, all four models passed, with V4.1 Flash performing most stably and achieving the best industrial UI aesthetic.66% similarUnverifiedV4.1 Flash merges the previous three modes—"Fast," "Expert," and "Real Image"—into a single unified entry point.65% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/913832API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/913832MCP
get_claim(id=913832)