Unverified80% confidenceTradeoffTime unknown
涤棉混纺（如65/35）比纯棉更抗撕裂、缩水率低、快干，但透气和触感稍差；夏季或干燥作业选纯棉，潮湿多汗环境选涤棉混纺
1
Sources
80%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
-
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
Unverified涤65%/棉35%的涤棉混纺面料透气性明显弱于纯棉或棉65/涤35的高棉比配方，夏季高温多汗场景穿着舒适度有限。94% similarUnverified纯棉吸湿透气舒适但易皱缩水、干得慢；涤纶/氨纶混纺速干免烫抗皱但吸湿性差贴身闷汗有味；商务选纯棉，运动选混纺92% similarUnverified棉60/涤40比例兼顾了棉的透气吸湿与涤纶的挺括抗皱，但相比纯棉面料，夏季闷热感更明显；相比高涤比例面料，免烫效果略弱。92% similarUnverified纯棉最亲肤透气但易皱易缩水；加5-10%氨纶提升弹性和抗皱但透气略降；加聚酯纤维更挺括抗皱但闷汗。夏季贴身选纯棉，需要挺括感选混纺91% similarUnverified纯棉更透气亲肤但缩水易皱，混纺（棉+5-10%氨纶或涤纶）抗皱抗变形但透气性下降；夏季重透气选纯棉，通勤要挺括选混纺91% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/92089API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/92089MCP
get_claim(id=92089)