Unverified50% confidenceSolutionExact time
When writing Evals, RFC-style wording such as must/must not/should should be used in the judge prompt to eliminate ambiguity, and questions should be kept atomic (one question asks only one thing).
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
9/16/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
Unverified英美法系中的先例原则（Stare Decisis）要求法律论证必须引用权威判例，其中只有判决理由（ratio decidendi）具有法律约束力，附带意见（obiter dicta）则不具约束力63% similarUnverifiedSimply optimizing prompt wording is unlikely to fundamentally resolve the problem of misclassification, and structural adjustments to the review mechanism design are needed.62% similarUnverifiedAI principles are merely statements of intent that can neither be audited nor written into contracts, and need to be operationalized into specific, measurable, risk-calibrated functional and non-functional requirements.61% similarUnverifiedAnthropic官方建议编写CLAUDE.md时遵循简洁优先、可执行命令优先于描述性文字、负面约束要具体等核心原则61% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/925611API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/925611MCP
get_claim(id=925611)