Unverified50% confidenceFactExact time
The United States operates a dual interstate recording consent legal system with both one-party consent and two-party/all-party consent regimes.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
9/20/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedU.S. states such as California and Illinois adopt an all-party consent standard, meaning all participants must be informed and consent to recording.78% similarUnverifiedCalifornia and 11 other U.S. states require two-party consent, while New York and 37 other states require only one-party consent.74% similarUnverifiedU.S. federal law adopts a one-party consent principle for recording, but more than ten states including California and Illinois require two-party consent; the EU's GDPR has strict regulations on recording; Chinese law requires authorization before recording another person's calls.68% similarUnverified美国窃听法主要规制音频录制，对无声视频录制的规制相对薄弱，且存在单方同意与全方同意州的法律差异65% similarUnverified美国联邦法律采用通话录音单方同意原则，但加利福尼亚、伊利诺伊等十余个州要求所有通话参与方均须知情同意64% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/937435API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/937435MCP
get_claim(id=937435)