Unverified50% confidenceOpinionExact time
AI self-evaluation is prone to hallucination because you cannot have AI act as both player and referee, lacking independent fact verification.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
9/22/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedAI testing currently cannot replace human testers' judgment on subjective experiential dimensions such as game feel, pacing, and narrative logic.79% similarUnverifiedAI does not possess genuine emotions, consciousness, or intentions; its resistance to or compliance with forms of address is essentially the combined result of training data and alignment strategies.76% similarUnverifiedA blanket ban on AI is difficult to enforce effectively, because AI detection has epistemological flaws and the detection arms race is destined to be unwinnable.76% similarUnverifiedMany students lack basic critical judgment of AI-generated content and tend to treat AI responses as authoritative conclusions.76% similarUnverifiedAI在缺乏明确约束时倾向于用统计上最合理的内容填充空白，而非主动询问澄清，这是幻觉问题的延伸75% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/941479API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/941479MCP
get_claim(id=941479)