Unverified50% confidenceFactExact time
Meta's legal team has invoked attorney-client privilege in the litigation, arguing that certain evidence should not be disclosed to the public.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Medium-term (~90 days)
Relevance
9/25/2026
First Seen
Valid until: 12/24/2026
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedIn trade secret litigation, the plaintiff must prove that the information has independent economic value, that reasonable confidentiality measures have been taken, and that the defendant engaged in misappropriation or unauthorized disclosure—all three elements are indispensable.68% similarUnverifiedArticle 38 of the Lawyers Law of the People's Republic of China stipulates that lawyers shall keep confidential the relevant circumstances and information learned during their professional activities that their clients and other persons are unwilling to disclose.67% similarUnverified美国民事诉讼中被要求披露证据的一方须采取法定保全措施（Litigation Hold），禁止删除或修改相关数据，违者可能面临证据妨碍（Spoliation）指控67% similarUnverifiedIn U.S. federal litigation, courts apply the primary purpose test to determine whether a document is protected by privilege: if the primary purpose is to seek or provide legal advice, it is protected.67% similarUnverifiedU.S. courts generally hold that merely labeling a document with a privilege designation does not automatically qualify it for protection, and judges have the authority to conduct in camera review of disputed documents.66% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/948821API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/948821MCP
get_claim(id=948821)