Unverified50% confidenceDecision RuleExact time
Elsevier and Springer Nature stipulate that AI may not be listed as a co-author of a paper, but allow its auxiliary use to be described in the methodology section.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Medium-term (~90 days)
Relevance
9/25/2026
First Seen
Valid until: 12/24/2026
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedScenarios where AI should not be used include opinion pieces expressing personal stances, original analytical and argumentative content, and problems one hopes to think through by writing.69% similarUnverifiedAnthropic's official guidance recommends that AI suggestions for modifying CLAUDE.md should be reviewed by humans, rather than allowing the AI to directly modify team rules.66% similarUnverified评测结论认为目前性价比AI模型仍无法替代真人作者的核心工作，更适合承担结构搭建、初稿生成等标准化工作65% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/949880API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/949880MCP
get_claim(id=949880)