Unverified50% confidenceFactExact time
In real systematic review data, the number of excluded articles far exceeds the number of included articles, with the ultimately included literature often accounting for only 1%–5% of the total.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
9/28/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedOn the news classification task, few-shot prompting achieved an average improvement of +24 percentage points; on the legal text task the improvement was only +3.4 percentage points, with two models showing performance degradation.64% similarUnverifiedAI batch writing exhibits a quality decay phenomenon, manifesting as subsequent articles showing a noticeable gap compared to the first article in both length and depth.64% similarUnverified曾有研究显示超过半数的公开医学AI论文存在不同程度的数据泄漏问题63% similarUnverifiedApproximately 10–15% of papers receive a score increase after rebuttal, but the number that ultimately reverse a rejection is even smaller.62% similarUnverifiedPapers receiving scores of 2/3/3 at NeurIPS are almost certain to be rejected, with the statistical probability of entering the acceptance range being below 5%.61% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/955689API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/955689MCP
get_claim(id=955689)