Unverified50% confidenceOpinionExact time
Within the "Responsible Scaling Policy" framework, the authority to define thresholds, choose evaluation methods, and decide on result disclosure all remain inside the company, which critics argue is equivalent to letting athletes serve as their own referees.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
9/30/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedHaving leading vendors such as OpenAI take the lead in setting standards carries a dual implication: the power to set standards may create barriers that favor incumbent players.67% similarUnverifiedThe Challenge Loop has two fatal problems: the main agent is entirely self-managed, making it impossible to control how judgment standards are passed on, and the quality benchmark relies on existing products, causing the Critic to fabricate standards when building something entirely new.63% similarVerifiedIndustry giants can set compliance thresholds favorable to themselves by dominating the formulation of regulatory rules—thresholds that are merely cost items for large companies but may be fatal entry barriers for small competitors and open-source projects.63% similarUnverifiedThe role conflict of model developers being both 'referee' and 'player' is driving safety evaluation from an internal function toward external third-party services63% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/961584API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/961584MCP
get_claim(id=961584)