Unverified50% confidenceOpinionExact time
AI has created a third-author paradox: a participant that makes substantive technical contributions yet cannot bear legal or moral responsibility.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
10/2/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedAI cannot truly bear responsibility, and in scenarios involving ethics, law, safety, and major business decisions, humans must make the final judgment.72% similarUnverifiedGuidelines published by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) characterize AI as a tool rather than an author, on the grounds that it lacks the capacity to be held accountable for research content.72% similarUnverifiedAI无法签署具有法律约束力的合同，无法在丑闻中承担公众问责，是CEO难以被替代的社会性功能71% similarUnverifiedAI is optimized to generate safe content that avoids errors, whereas true literary breakthroughs often come from breaking rules and defying expectations.69% similarUnverifiedThe position of most mainstream journals such as Nature and Science is that AI tools may be acknowledged in the acknowledgments or methods section, but cannot be listed as authors.69% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/967411API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/967411MCP
get_claim(id=967411)