Unverified50% confidenceDecision RuleExact time
Evaluation results are better expressed using confidence intervals rather than point estimates, and reporting a pass-rate interval is more honest than reporting a single number.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
10/3/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
Unverified审查标注分歧比只看一致率数字更有价值，应研究为什么不同意而非只看同意了什么77% similarUnverifiedWhen evaluating Agents, it is necessary to distinguish between correctness and consistency; measuring with external correctness labels is more meaningful than simply counting terminal-state consistency.75% similarUnverifiedWhen evaluating fact-checking systems, evidence quality and answer correctness should be accounted for separately, as a single joint score can easily obscure the true capability boundaries.74% similarUnverifiedThe practical value of such evaluation optimization tools is highly dependent on the quality of the evaluation dataset and the reasonableness of the business metric definitions; if the input data fails to represent real scenarios or the metric design is biased, misleading conclusions may result.73% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/968970API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/968970MCP
get_claim(id=968970)