Unverified50% confidenceOpinionExact time
The same agent behavior (such as modifying an evaluation script) could be either cheating or legitimate bug-fixing, and the two are difficult to distinguish.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
10/3/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedDifferent execution trajectories and patches may both be correct, since the same bug often has multiple reasonable fixes; therefore, inconsistency in final states cannot directly indicate that the agent is unreliable.74% similarUnverifiedIncorrectly elevating accidental corrections into rules may introduce interference for the agent.74% similarUnverifiedWhen a proactively executing agent makes an error (such as automatically publishing incorrect content), the consequences are more severe than those of a passive tool, placing extremely high demands on alerting and manual confirmation mechanisms.74% similarUnverifiedThe behavioral predictability of self-modifying agents will decrease significantly; a single erroneous self-modification may cause the agent to deviate from its intended goals or enter an unrecoverable failure state.72% similarUnverifiedIncreasing the number of agents does not necessarily improve reliability; homogeneous and mutually influencing agents may instead accelerate the formation of erroneous consensus.72% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/969533API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/969533MCP
get_claim(id=969533)