Unverified50% confidenceTradeoffExact time
The propose-approve pattern sacrifices some degree of automation in exchange for safety and compliance, and may not deliver an ideal experience for high-frequency, small-amount, low-risk scenarios.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
10/4/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedAgent security protocols face a trade-off between security strength and performance overhead as well as autonomy—being too strict will reduce response speed, while being too lenient renders security meaningless, and the ideal solution is tiered authorization.77% similarUnverifiedAnthropic officially acknowledges that automatic mode can only reduce risk but cannot eliminate it, and recommends that high-risk changes to production infrastructure still be reviewed manually.76% similarUnverifiedRelying on prompt constraints to prevent dangerous operations is inherently unreliable, because the model may be jailbroken, make misjudgments, or forget constraints during long conversations.75% similarVerifiedBlack-box decision-making is unsuitable for high-stakes scenarios, and AI moderation systems should have traceable triggering reasons when making decisions such as account bans.75% similarPartially VerifiedIn high-risk scenarios, systems should be designed to fail conservatively—when AI is uncertain, it is better to hand off to human processing than to risk automatic execution.74% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/974649API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/974649MCP
get_claim(id=974649)