Unverified50% confidenceBenchmarkExact time
The lab that published HakemBench ranked its own model 7th with a composite score of 0.660.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Short-term (~14 days)
Relevance
10/5/2026
First Seen
Valid until: 10/19/2026
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedWhen all models are scored only on the remaining four tracks, the lab's model's composite score becomes 0.678, ranking it 6th.64% similarUnverifiedOn HakemBench's 16-row leaderboard, the top performer achieved a composite score of 0.888.58% similarUnverified在MoE模型中每个token只激活少量Expert（通常2-4个，Top-K路由），实际计算量可能仅相当于6-7B的Dense模型55% similarUnverifiedHARNESSEVO achieved an overall binary success rate of 0.657, compared to 0.642 for both the original harness and flat string evolution.54% similarUnverifiedUnder the same concise prompt and reference-overlap scorer, the published 406M specialized model leads at least five commercially hosted large models by at least 6.2 points on ROUGE-1.53% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/975449API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/975449MCP
get_claim(id=975449)