Unverified50% confidenceBenchmarkExact time
The Label-Only method achieves an accuracy of 0.896 and a span F1 of 0.564, with verbatim citation improving from 0.597 before training to 0.729.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
10/7/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedCriticGen's F1 scores on criteria-based rationales and actionable suggestions improved from 0.6369/0.5994 to 0.7554/0.7900, respectively.70% similarUnverifiedIn guided mode, the average end-to-end accuracy increased from 28.6% to 33.7%, and the ambiguity detection F1 score increased from 45.3% to 64.9%68% similarUnverifiedF16 (16-bit) precision is twice as slow as 8-bit inference but offers almost no quality improvement, and is not recommended68% similarUnverifiedIn this task, identifying where a problem occurs (localization F1 generally above 0.78) is much easier than accurately determining the type of problem (label F1 around 0.5).67% similarUnverifiedQwen 3.6 Max in neutral mode has an ambiguity detection F1 of only 16% and asks an average of only 0.07 questions per task, but once it does ask for clarification, the accuracy reaches 94.7%67% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/982998API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/982998MCP
get_claim(id=982998)