Unverified50% confidenceTradeoffExact time
A local question-answering mechanism based on paragraph retrieval and matching carries no hallucination risk and answers come directly from the source text, but it cannot perform cross-paragraph reasoning or synthesize and summarize information.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
10/11/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
Unverified不提供上下文时，本地小模型对领域问题会拒绝回答或产生幻觉，引入 RAG 后能给出准确答案72% similarUnverifiedVector search can retrieve text chunks with high similarity scores, but cannot explain the reasoning logic behind answers, nor structurally connect facts scattered across different documents.70% similarUnverifiedQ&A mode (Ask) only answers questions without performing operations, but can read local files and consumes the fewest credits.67% similarUnverifiedRelying solely on vector similarity retrieval often yields imprecise recall, necessitating a hybrid retrieval approach that combines keyword-based retrieval.66% similarUnverifiedTwo widely cited direct-probing benchmarks exhibited saturation, as frontier models generally gave neutral responses to straightforward questions, causing the benchmarks to detect almost no bias.66% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/996421API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/996421MCP
get_claim(id=996421)