Unverified50% confidenceBenchmarkExact time
All four models correctly read all 48 clean invoices and 48 placebo invoices, with zero errors across 4,704 scoring responses, and 0 of the 521 fabricated numbers happened to equal the true total that was obscured.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
10/11/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Claims
UnverifiedThree independent Subagents performed adversarial re-verification of the retrospective diary, checking 120 verifiable claims (including 26 commit hashes and more than 40 cited line numbers), resulting in zero fabrications and nine corrections (all involving line number drift and unit conversion issues).69% similarUnverifiedEach model was paired with four prompt types—zero-shot, few-shot, chain-of-thought, and few-shot plus chain-of-thought—each in two groups, producing approximately 52,000 labels in total.67% similarUnverifiedIn memory recall tests, the 12B model answered 82 out of 100 questions correctly and the 31B model answered 98 out of 100, with neither model hallucinating answers.66% similarUnverifiedA hand-crafted library of 22 calculators achieved perfect accuracy on the 440 cases it supported, but abstained on the remaining cases, yielding an overall coverage rate of only 40.0%.64% similarUnverified在一个396个文件的大型混合职责项目上测试时，召回率几乎跌到零64% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/997258API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/997258MCP
get_claim(id=997258)