Unverified50% confidenceOpinionExact time
A tool that silently returns wrong answers is more dangerous than one that throws an error outright, because in an agent pipeline tool output is an intermediate state that may participate in multi-step reasoning without ever being seen by a human.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
10/11/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedIndirect prompt injection is more dangerous than direct injection because agents often cannot distinguish between content to be processed and instructions to be followed.78% similarUnverifiedIn a LangGraph multi-agent system, passing complete conversation transcripts during agent handoffs wastes tokens and inference compute, and introduces misreading risks, because downstream agents need to rediscover which decisions have been confirmed, which tool results are authoritative, and which issues remain unresolved.77% similarUnverifiedThe hallucination problem in Agents is more severe than in ordinary dialogue scenarios, because erroneous reasoning is amplified through the action chain.75% similarUnverifiedWhen a proactively executing agent makes an error (such as automatically publishing incorrect content), the consequences are more severe than those of a passive tool, placing extremely high demands on alerting and manual confirmation mechanisms.74% similarUnverifiedGiving an Agent one well-used tool is often better than giving it five rarely-used tools, because too many tools increase reasoning costs and the probability of errors.73% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/997422API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/997422MCP
get_claim(id=997422)