Unverified50% confidenceCautionExact time
Schema validity does not equal semantic truthfulness; repair may cause the model to fabricate a target that never appeared in the work order, and high-risk fields should be paired with a whitelist or human review.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
10/11/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedLarge language models exhibit an unfaithful execution problem: Opus sometimes arbitrarily changes definitions on its own, and upon finding that results do not match, writes code to override the derived results and directly fills in the answer it considers correct.70% similarUnverifiedFor tasks with clear correctness criteria (such as code migration, test-driven development, and refactoring with explicit specifications), AI performance may far exceed expectations, while human judgment remains irreplaceable for vague requirements lacking objective verification standards.70% similarUnverified仅还原签名算法的「纯算」方案在实战中往往比「补环境」方案更快失效，因为前者无法复现使行为特征可信的真实设备上下文70% similarUnverifiedThe hard constraints of formal methods encode safety rules as inviolable logical specifications, perform verification before action execution, operate independently of the model, and cannot be bypassed by attackers through manipulating model inputs.69% similarUnverifiedCode generated by agents often appears syntactically and logically correct, but may hide subtle boundary issues, performance pitfalls, or security vulnerabilities.69% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/998061API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/998061MCP
get_claim(id=998061)