Unverified50% confidenceDecision RuleExact time
Evidence provided by a true verification tool should allow users to independently verify without needing to trust the tool, the agent, or anyone's summary; the criterion is whether a stranger can recalculate the proof themselves and arrive at the same result.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
10/11/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
Unverifiedsecurity-audit-skill emphasizes that findings must undergo independent verification, and preliminary judgments are not directly treated as conclusions.79% similarUnverifiedRIA requires the agent to provide conclusive evidence from machine code for every conclusion; content that cannot be verified must be marked as unknown rather than fabricated.76% similarUnverifiedThe conclusions of mechanistic interpretability research can be independently verified and falsified through controlled experiments, giving them scientific significance—unlike self-descriptions elicited by prompt engineering.74% similarUnverifiedThe core principle of falsifiable closed-loop testing is: success on the sender's side does not count; new evidence must be generated by the target end, and the agent must be able to read back that evidence.74% similarUnverifiedThe bidirectional verification mechanism recommends that, in addition to verifying whether generated content is supported by source material, the reverse verification of whether all key information in the source material has been covered should be performed, with absence verification explicitly set as an independent evaluation dimension.74% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/998853API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/998853MCP
get_claim(id=998853)