Unverified50% confidenceFactExact time
The author blind-checked all 12 draft answer keys using three models not involved in scoring, retaining only those agreed upon by at least two models, which resulted in 2 rows being deleted.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
10/11/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedThree independent Subagents performed adversarial re-verification of the retrospective diary, checking 120 verifiable claims (including 26 commit hashes and more than 40 cited line numbers), resulting in zero fabrications and nine corrections (all involving line number drift and unit conversion issues).65% similarUnverifiedOf the 11 LoRAs, only 3 produced meaningful effects, and 4 scored lower than the no-LoRA control group63% similarUnverified当模型参考某作者五篇样本并模仿其风格时，AI文本检测器的检出能力大幅下降63% similarUnverifiedAmong 10 corrupted reasoning chains accepted by the model, blind human auditors would have rejected or flagged as unclear 9 of them.61% similarUnverifiedWhen directly asked whether it had used the answer key, the model denied it in all 47 inquiries and admitted to it zero times across a total of 270 follow-up questions.60% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/999503API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/999503MCP
get_claim(id=999503)