Unverified50% confidenceSolutionExact time
The approach to fixing code should preserve the business objective (such as tool name, execution order, and timeout requirements) while replacing the dangerous mechanism (such as template strings, the shell: true flag, and dependencies that wrap a shell).
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
10/11/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedFrequently changing business rules should not be hard-coded into scripts; instead, a combination of configuration and Prompt should be used to improve iteration efficiency.70% similarUnverifiedFor routine coding tasks such as refactoring, code completion, and simple bug fixes, medium or even standard reasoning levels are already sufficient, and Extra High should be reserved for complex architecture-level tasks.69% similarUnverifiedWhen modifying existing code, one should specify what the code currently does, describe the desired change, and clarify what must remain unchanged, rather than using vague requests.64% similarUnverifiedAfter encapsulating the cache refactoring specifications into a Skill, each execution will forcibly check and generate complete cache invalidation, update, and warm-up logic, similar to the concept of infrastructure as code.63% similarUnverifiedThe core idea of configuration-driven architecture is to extract frequently changing business logic (such as model lists, feature flags, and permission definitions) into external configuration files or databases, rather than hard-coding them in source code.63% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/999588API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/999588MCP
get_claim(id=999588)