Contextual Reliability
A reliability evaluation framework proposed for agent tool-calling that assesses whether a tool invocation delivers complete, consistent, and trustworthy information within a given context, rather than relying solely on surface-level success indicators such as HTTP status codes.
Timeline (last 90 days)
The paper proposes a new concept of contextual reliability, arguing that the reliability of a tool call depends on whether it delivers complete, consistent, and trustworthy information in a specific context.
An API call that returns status code 200 but loses a critical field is still considered a failure under the contextual reliability evaluation framework.
The countermeasure recommendations provided by the research fall into four categories: testing, disclosure, monitoring, and measurement.
All Facts (3)
The paper proposes a new concept of contextual reliability, arguing that the reliability of a tool call depends on whether it delivers complete, consistent, and trustworthy information in a specific context.
50%UnverifiedAn API call that returns status code 200 but loses a critical field is still considered a failure under the contextual reliability evaluation framework.
50%UnverifiedThe countermeasure recommendations provided by the research fall into four categories: testing, disclosure, monitoring, and measurement.
50%