[KongchangAI]
Product

research-ledger

An MIT-licensed open-source tool for research discipline with AI assistance, distributed as a folder of SKILL.md files. Through processes such as sieving, translation, preregistration and blind-test rounds, it helps researchers avoid self-deception, and records each idea under one of five verdicts, including DEAD, LANDED and BRIDGE, in an append-only ledger.

Timeline (last 90 days)

Oct 13

research-ledger is an MIT-licensed open-source tool in the form of a SKILL.md folder that turns an AI assistant capable of reading skills into a disciplined research partner.

Unverified50%
Oct 13

research-ledger can be obtained via git clone https://github.com/Freeky7819/research-ledger and copied to ~/.claude/skills/ for use.

Unverified50%
Oct 13

research-ledger also supports running in Claude.ai (uploading the compressed folder) and Codex (the folder contains agents/openai.yaml).

Unverified50%
Oct 13

research-ledger has five verdict types in total: DEAD, LANDED, BRIDGE CANDIDATE, BRIDGE, EXPLANATION.

Unverified50%
Oct 13

research-ledger requires that preregistration freeze the predictions, thresholds, control groups, and statistical power, with a separate PREREG commit pushed to Git before the run serving as timestamp proof.

Unverified50%
Oct 13

research-ledger stipulates that pilot tests may adjust parameters but can never give a PASS verdict.

Unverified50%
Oct 13

In a numerology experiment, about 3700 formulas could fit both the real measured ratios and randomly fabricated fake target ratios, showing that these fits do not constitute valid evidence.

Unverified50%
Oct 13

In a continual learning test, the noise control group was algebraically identical to the treatment group, rendering the test statistically powerless.

Unverified50%
Oct 13

research-ledger's blind-test rounds are triggered at milestone points, sending the same question seed to models from different labs and different vendors, conducted in clean conversations with no project context, to strip away the author's own framing but unable to eliminate the bias of shared training data among models.

Unverified50%
Oct 13

The research-ledger ledger has an append-only structure, retaining each failure record and the applicable conditions of its lesson.

Unverified50%

1 more timeline events

All Facts (11)

Unverified

research-ledger's rules make clear that it can only reduce self-deception and cannot produce scientific discoveries.

50%
Unverified

research-ledger can be obtained via git clone https://github.com/Freeky7819/research-ledger and copied to ~/.claude/skills/ for use.

50%
Unverified

research-ledger also supports running in Claude.ai (uploading the compressed folder) and Codex (the folder contains agents/openai.yaml).

50%
Unverified

research-ledger has five verdict types in total: DEAD, LANDED, BRIDGE CANDIDATE, BRIDGE, EXPLANATION.

50%
Unverified

research-ledger requires that preregistration freeze the predictions, thresholds, control groups, and statistical power, with a separate PREREG commit pushed to Git before the run serving as timestamp proof.

50%
Unverified

research-ledger stipulates that pilot tests may adjust parameters but can never give a PASS verdict.

50%
Unverified

research-ledger's blind-test rounds are triggered at milestone points, sending the same question seed to models from different labs and different vendors, conducted in clean conversations with no project context, to strip away the author's own framing but unable to eliminate the bias of shared training data among models.

50%
Unverified

The research-ledger ledger has an append-only structure, retaining each failure record and the applicable conditions of its lesson.

50%
Unverified

research-ledger is an MIT-licensed open-source tool in the form of a SKILL.md folder that turns an AI assistant capable of reading skills into a disciplined research partner.

50%
Unverified

In a numerology experiment, about 3700 formulas could fit both the real measured ratios and randomly fabricated fake target ratios, showing that these fits do not constitute valid evidence.

50%
Unverified

In a continual learning test, the noise control group was algebraically identical to the treatment group, rendering the test statistically powerless.

50%

Source Articles