Ternary Nine-Dimensional 19683 Cognitive System
An open-source cognitive framework based on a ternary hexagram symbol system that fully expands a state space of 3^9 = 19,683 states. It provides a recomputable, falsifiable, and evolvable deterministic cognition layer for governing large-model hallucination and agent decision drift.
Timeline (last 90 days)
The project "Trinary Nine-Dimensional 19683 Cognition System" has been open-sourced, with code hosted in the GitHub repository q1z2q3-debug/trinary-19683.
The project fully expanded the 3^9 = 19683 state space using D/R/T ternary encoding, and achieved zero-missing coverage between the numbering of the 19683 hexagrams and the line values.
The project provides four delivery forms: a single-file offline model, a deduction and derivation workbench (visual operation), a service console providing more than 15 APIs, and a Python package under the Apache-2.0 license.
The design goal of this system is to provide a "solidified after verification" anchor for large models, used to deterministically validate hypotheses generated by LLMs, rather than to replace the free association of large models.
The author believes that the criterion for judging that this system is not a fortune-telling tool lies in being recomputable, verifiable, traceable, and reversible.
All Facts (5)
The project "Trinary Nine-Dimensional 19683 Cognition System" has been open-sourced, with code hosted in the GitHub repository q1z2q3-debug/trinary-19683.
50%UnverifiedThe project fully expanded the 3^9 = 19683 state space using D/R/T ternary encoding, and achieved zero-missing coverage between the numbering of the 19683 hexagrams and the line values.
50%UnverifiedThe project provides four delivery forms: a single-file offline model, a deduction and derivation workbench (visual operation), a service console providing more than 15 APIs, and a Python package under the Apache-2.0 license.
50%UnverifiedThe design goal of this system is to provide a "solidified after verification" anchor for large models, used to deterministically validate hypotheses generated by LLMs, rather than to replace the free association of large models.
50%UnverifiedThe author believes that the criterion for judging that this system is not a fortune-telling tool lies in being recomputable, verifiable, traceable, and reversible.
50%