Unverified50% confidenceDecision RuleExact time
Decision recommendations: choose Engy when you need to know precisely which open-source model responded (e.g., evaluations, long-running agent runs); choose SayGM when using Claude/GPT/Gemini and wanting the routing layer sealed; choose SayGM's -tee models when using open-source models and requiring the strongest privacy.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Medium-term (~90 days)
Relevance
10/12/2026
First Seen
Valid until: 1/10/2027
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
Unverified分层模型策略将 GPT-4o 等高能力模型用于规划决策节点，中间执行步骤使用 GPT-4o-mini 或本地开源模型（如 Llama 3）以控制成本68% similarUnverified工具选型建议：追求专业深度优先选Claude Code，国内环境可用智谱GLM作后端，追求易用性可选Codex + GPT组合67% similarUnverifiedOpenAI has chosen to develop reasoning models (o series) and conversational models (GPT series) separately.66% similarUnverifiedThe recommended process for building an MVP is: use ChatGPT to organize the problem, market, and solution into a PRD, then hand the PRD to a frontier large model such as Opus 5.5 or Codex.65% similarUnverifiedSayGM is a drop-in gateway that supports Claude, GPT, Gemini, and a range of open-source models, while exposing three API types: OpenAI-compatible, Anthropic-native, and Gemini-native.65% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1000552API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1000552MCP
get_claim(id=1000552)