Unverified50% confidenceBenchmarkExact time
In a fair comparison using only the baseline window input, PRISM's AUROC was 0.8895, broadly on par with UniPACT's 0.8937 and MDS-ED's 0.8889.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
10/12/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
VerifiedAccording to common industry standards, AUC > 0.9 is excellent, 0.8–0.9 is good, 0.7–0.8 is fair, 0.5–0.7 is poor, and 0.5 is equivalent to random guessing.73% similarUnverifiedAfter supervised fine-tuning, PRISM improved to 0.8611 AUROC on the external MC-MED cohort, surpassing the locally trained traditional model.68% similarUnverifiedA compact fusion model using the same five evidence streams and frozen encoders achieved only 0.7652 AUROC under matched inputs, while PRISM reached 0.9092 under the same settings.66% similarUnverifiedAureaCam's composition scoring range is from 0 to 100.64% similarUnverifiedAUC is a comprehensive evaluation metric for binary classification models, with a value range of 0.5 to 1.0; it is not affected by class imbalance, and in clinical prediction, an AUC of 0.7–0.8 has some reference value, 0.8–0.9 is considered good, and above 0.9 is considered excellent.63% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1001098API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1001098MCP
get_claim(id=1001098)