Unverified50% confidenceCautionExact time
A confidently wrong verdict is more dangerous than an ambiguous draft, because downstream systems will act directly on the verdict.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
10/12/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedWhen a proactively executing agent makes an error (such as automatically publishing incorrect content), the consequences are more severe than those of a passive tool, placing extremely high demands on alerting and manual confirmation mechanisms.79% similarUnverifiedA half-complete answer that passes validation is more dangerous than a request that explicitly fails, because the former masquerades as a correct result and flows into downstream systems.78% similarUnverifiedA correct type does not mean a correct judgment; high-confidence results can still be wrong.76% similarUnverified作者认为执行轨迹（trace）比自动评判结论更可靠，是判断Agent失败是否真实存在的关键依据74% similarUnverifiedIf those who make wrong decisions never truly bear the consequences, wrong decisions will keep recurring.73% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1005193API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1005193MCP
get_claim(id=1005193)