Unverified50% confidenceFactExact time
A correct type does not mean a correct judgment; high-confidence results can still be wrong.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
9/19/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedThe normalization discrepancy in the paper was severe enough that one conclusion appeared to directly contradict a known theorem.72% similarUnverifiedIf those who make wrong decisions never truly bear the consequences, wrong decisions will keep recurring.70% similarUnverifiedThe phenomenon of being 'formally correct but substantively harmful' is more difficult to detect through automated means than pure hallucination, because traditional fact-checking mechanisms cannot capture this type of risk.70% similarUnverifiedWhen a model lacks accurate knowledge of a particular library, it tends to generate syntactically correct but semantically incorrect code—so-called 'confident errors.'70% similarUnverifiedConflating categories of research error leads to two dangers: retrospectively dismissing all failed explorations with hindsight, or allowing research with epistemic flaws to escape scrutiny.69% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/934842API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/934842MCP
get_claim(id=934842)