Unverified50% confidenceEventExact time
Atomic Agent once allowed Workers to return tasks to the planner via needs_orchestrator, and this exception channel was exploited by the planner for 13 writes in testing; in one run, 4 of 6 tasks took this path.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Medium-term (~90 days)
Relevance
10/12/2026
First Seen
Valid until: 1/10/2027
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedAtomic Agent chose to attach a rejection message ('you are responsible for planning, the Worker is responsible for writing') to the tool call's returned result rather than dynamically removing the write tool, in order to protect the local planning model's KV cache and avoid cache invalidation caused by a change in the prompt prefix.69% similarUnverifiedAtomic Agent's current rule: no change operations may be executed during the planner's entire turn, all MCP tools are treated as change operations, the Worker is responsible for writing files, and the planner may only read files, run read-only checks, and re-delegate tasks.67% similarUnverifiedAtomic Agent provides importers for six Agents, each supporting a --dry-run mode that writes nothing; API keys are migrated only when --migrate-secrets is explicitly used.67% similarUnverified在命令行终端中无法同时给多个Agent下达任务，而Multica支持任务队列，让一个人同时管理十几个AI Agent67% similarUnverifiedFor long-running, multi-step agent scenarios, how to trace task execution chains spanning hours or even days remains an immature engineering challenge.66% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1010241API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1010241MCP
get_claim(id=1010241)