Unverified50% confidenceSolutionExact time
Atomic Agent chose to attach a rejection message ('you are responsible for planning, the Worker is responsible for writing') to the tool call's returned result rather than dynamically removing the write tool, in order to protect the local planning model's KV cache and avoid cache invalidation caused by a change in the prompt prefix.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
10/12/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedAtomic Agent's current rule: no change operations may be executed during the planner's entire turn, all MCP tools are treated as change operations, the Worker is responsible for writing files, and the planner may only read files, run read-only checks, and re-delegate tasks.74% similarUnverifiedAgent programming introduces a 'plan-execute-feedback' loop mechanism, in which the model can invoke terminal execution, read error messages, analyze failure causes, and revise its strategy before trying again, distinguishing it from the single-turn passive interaction of traditional code completion.71% similarUnverifiedAtomic Agent once allowed Workers to return tasks to the planner via needs_orchestrator, and this exception channel was exploited by the planner for 13 writes in testing; in one run, 4 of 6 tasks took this path.69% similarUnverifiedThe agent flow is: send a message to the model to get a response; if the stop reason is not tool use, return the text; otherwise, iterate through the tool-call blocks, validate parameters, run the function, push the result back as a tool result, and loop.68% similarUnverifiedResponsibilities should be separated between the Agent (responsible for proposing, with no sending or credential modification) and the Executor (responsible for acting, only running proposals marked as approved and atomically checking status).66% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1010244API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1010244MCP
get_claim(id=1010244)