Unverified50% confidenceDecision RuleExact time
Non-compensatory gates directly reject infeasible candidates, preventing 'partial success' from being mistakenly treated as a high-quality sample.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
10/12/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedModels labeled 'obliterated' are uncensored versions with refusal mechanisms removed; in testing they more easily miss certain requirements in prompts, and uncensored does not mean better.66% similarUnverifiedIn high-stakes, high-compliance scenarios, hard failure (refusing service) is often preferable to soft failure (making confident errors); binary logic should be retained, or confidence systems should be made to lean toward rejection when uncertain.65% similarUnverifiedThe model's refusal more closely resembles performative compliance rather than substantive risk control64% similarUnverifiedSelf-restraint in the name of safety may objectively function to limit competition and maintain oligopolistic positions.64% similarUnverifiedManually sampling and comparing extraction results one by one can only verify the faithfulness of the extraction and cannot answer questions about predictive validity, nor can it scale.64% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1012829API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1012829MCP
get_claim(id=1012829)