Unverified50% confidenceFactExact time
The sample size of RCTs is usually small, resulting in insufficient precision in estimating causal effects; observational studies (OBS) have large sample sizes but may be disturbed by confounding factors.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
10/12/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
VerifiedRandomized controlled trials (RCTs) are regarded as the gold standard for causal inference in medicine and social science, but their external validity is often questioned.71% similarUnverifiedA Cochrane review indicated that the evidence for CBT is at best of low to moderate confidence.69% similarUnverifiedRegular expressions that pass initial benchmark testing may still expose problems under more rigorous adversarial probing, meaning passing a benchmark does not equate to true reliability.68% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1012922API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1012922MCP
get_claim(id=1012922)