Unverified50% confidenceBenchmarkExact time
On the Harvey Lab legal benchmark, Muse Wonderful Max scored 13.1 and Muse Wonder scored 10, far ahead of other models; Grok 4.7 scored 19.6 on this benchmark but was not included in the comparison chart.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Short-term (~14 days)
Relevance
10/13/2026
First Seen
Valid until: 10/27/2026
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedOn the Harvey LAB-AA legal benchmark, Muse Wonder scored 10.0 and Claude Opus 5.5 scored 4.2, doubling Wonder's score, but the highest score in the whole row is only Wonder Full's 13.1.80% similarUnverifiedOn DeepSWE 1.1, Muse Wonder beats Claude Opus 5.5 78.8 to 74.2, leads 10.0 to 4.2 on the Harvey legal agent benchmark LAB-AA, and leads 53.1 to 46.3 on SWE-Marathon.74% similarUnverifiedMeta's chart shows Muse Wonder beating Claude Opus 5.5 on long-horizon coding tasks: DeepSWE score 78.8 versus 74.2, SWE-Marathon score 53.1 versus 46.3.69% similarUnverifiedAmong the 14 benchmarks listed on Meta's model card, Muse Wonder (the API version) achieved 5 wins and 9 losses against Claude Opus 5.5.67% similarUnverifiedOn SWE-Marathon, Muse Wonder scored 53.1 and Claude Opus 5.5 scored 46.3, sourced from Abundant AI; however, a footnote states that the comparison used different agent harnesses and is not a controlled common comparison.65% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1013538API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1013538MCP
get_claim(id=1013538)